检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学资源与环境科学学院,湖北武汉430079
出 处:《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》2014年第5期561-565,580,共6页Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University
基 金:国家863计划资助项目(2012AA12A404);国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2012BAJ22B02-01);国家自然科学青年基金资助项目(41001229);测绘遥感信息工程国家重点实验室开放基金资助项目(11I03);虚拟地理环境教育部重点实验室资助项目(2012VGE03)~~
摘 要:从地图综合经典决策模式出发,提出了"算子、算法、参量"的三层决策模式与WPS交互流程之间的隐性对应关系,并由此扩展到通用的服务链创建;然后,利用这种对应关系梳理了服务语义增强必需的4类语义描述信息;最后,使用该信息扩展了WPS规范。该方法归纳的语义信息简洁精确,可分层次嵌入WPS服务的交互流程,在顾及标准的同时提升了地图综合服务的语义互操作能力。Web service and map generalization can improve syntactic and semantic interoperability how-ever their collaboration remains unsolved. On the one hand, standards for geospatial information serv-ices are generic and do not consider the specific field, such as map generalization; on the other hand, the generalization of knowledge is too complex to systematically extract accurate information to enrich the semantics of a map generalization service. This paper aims to investigate the classical "operator-al- gorithm-threshold" decision mode, introducing an implicit correspondence between the mode and WPS interaction process, and further extending this to service chaining. Based on this implicit relationship, four kinds of information suitable for enriching generalization services are summarized and analyzed in detail. Finally, this semantic information mentioned above is used to extend the WPS specification.The semantic information in this study is concise and accurate enough to be embedded in the WPS in-teraction process hierarchically and thus improves the semantic interoperability of a map generalization service while taking the OGC standard into account.
分 类 号:P283.1[天文地球—地图制图学与地理信息工程] P208[天文地球—测绘科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28