检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038 [2]武汉市公安刑侦局,430073
出 处:《刑事技术》2014年第2期14-16,共3页Forensic Science and Technology
摘 要:目的比较3种显现非渗透性客体上血潜手印方法的优劣。方法选择常见非渗透性3种客体制作血潜手印实验样本,制作手印遗留时间分别为1周、1个月、3个月,然后比较手印显现效果及显出率。结果在手印显出率方面,酸性黄和氨基黑10B法要优于二氧化钛,在排除背景干扰方面,酸性黄和二氧化钛法要优于氨基黑10B。结论酸性黄显现法更灵敏,在手印显现效果和显出率上具有更强优势。Objective To compare amido black, titanium dioxide (TiO2) and acid yellow 7 for development of blood fin- gerprint on nonporous surface. Methods Three kinds of solutions which were prepared with amido black, titanium dioxide and acid yellow 7 respectively were tested for development of blood fingerprints on non-porous surface, and the results were com- pared. Results The solutions containing amido black and acid yellow 7 were more effective than solution of titanium dioxide, while yellow 7 and titanium dioxide solutions was of advantage to reduce the background interference. Conclusion Acid yellow 7 was more sensitive and suitable for developing blood fingerprint.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198