检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何云飞[1,2] 罗宴吉[2] 彭振鹏[2] 李雪华[2] 董帜[2] 洪庆奋[2] 李子平[2] 冯仕庭[2]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学附属南海医院放射科,广东佛山528200 [2]中山大学附属第一医院放射科,广东广州510080
出 处:《中国介入影像与治疗学》2014年第5期324-327,共4页Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(81000626);广东省自然科学基金(S2011010004826);珠江科技新星专项(2012J2200084);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(10ykpy11)
摘 要:目的探讨不同影像学检查方法对检出胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(P-NEN)的价值。方法回顾性分析40例(共43个病灶)经手术后病理证实的P-NEN患者的影像学资料,包括CT、MRI、超声内镜(EUS)、PET/CT,与手术结果相对照,分析各种影像学方法对P-NEN的检出率。结果 CT、MRI、EUS及PET/CT对P-NEN病灶的检出率分别为76.74%(33/43)、94.87%(37/39)、94.59%(35/37)和51.52%(17/33)。MRI与EUS病灶检出率差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05),余两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论 MRI可作为P-NEN的首选影像学检查方法。Objective To compare various imaging methods for detecting pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (P-NEN). Methods Various image data, including CT, MRI, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and PET/CT of 40 patients with P-NEN were retrospectively analyzed and compared with results of surgical operation. The detecting rate of P-NEN of various ima- ging methods were analyzed statistically. Results Among 40 patients, there were 43 P-NEN lesions, the detection rate of CT, MRI, endoscopic ultrasonography and PET/CT was 76.74% (33/43), 94.87% (37/39), 94.59% (35/37) and 51.52% (17/33), respectively. The detection rate of MRI and EUS for P-NEN were not statistically different (P〉0.05), while statistically significant differences were found between each two other methods (all P〈0.05). Conclusion MRI can be regarded as the preferred imaging method for detecting P-NEN.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28