从法律术语看唐代刑法主观罪过的发展  

The Development of the Subjective Fault in Tang Dynasty Criminal Law through the Legal Terminology

作　　者：冯红[1] 

机构地区：[1]石家庄学院政法系,河北石家庄050035

出　　处：《河北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第2期91-94,159,共4页Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：石家庄学院博士科研启动基金项目<〈唐律疏议〉之自首减免刑罚原则>(11BJ012)

摘　　要：在《唐律疏议》的502条律文中,表述主观过错的法律术语多达13种,其可以归结为故意与过失,但不同于现代刑法中的故意与过失,有其特殊的内涵和外延。同时,唐律一方面注意主观罪过对定罪量刑的影响,另一方面又走向极端对仅有犯意而无行为的犯罪人也处罚,实行主观归罪,表明唐律处罚的不仅是人的行为,还包括人的思想。T here are as many as 13 kinds of legal terminology expressing subjective fault in the 502th law of “The Tang Law Dredges Opinion” .It can be boiled down to deliberation and negligence and is differ-ent from the deliberation and negligence in the modern criminal law which has special connotation and denotation .Meantime ,the Tang code not only pays attention to the influence of the subjective fault to the criterions for the conviction ,but also punishes the offender without behavior of criminal through the subjective culpability ,which indicates that the punishment in the Tang code involves behavior and ideol-ogy .

关 键 词：古代刑法 唐律疏议 主观罪过形式 故意 过失 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]