Differing Effects of Intra-Product International Division of Labor on Technological Progress:Comparing Proactive Participation with Passive Inclusion  

Differing Effects of Intra-Product International Division of Labor on Technological Progress:Comparing Proactive Participation with Passive Inclusion

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王燕梅 简泽 

机构地区:[1]Institute of Industrial Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences [2]School of Economics and Management,Tongji University

出  处:《China Economist》2014年第3期104-114,共11页中国经济学人(英文版)

摘  要:This paper has identified two models of intra-product international division of labor:the model of passive inclusion and the model of proactive participation.Their difference is essentially whether participation in international division of labor is dominated by multinational firms or by local firms.At the level of representative sectors,some characteristic variables of participation in international division of labor demonstrate significant industry differences.Models of division of labor affect technology progress.According to the empirical analysis result at the micro-level of four sectors,no matter for export or the contribution of learning by doing to corporate technology progress,the model of proactive participation is superior to the model of passive inclusion;under the model of passive inclusion,the technology spillover effect of import is smaller than "learning by doing " effect;under the model of proactive participation,technology spillover effect is over two times the "learning by doing" effect.This paper has identified two models of intra-product international division of labor: the model of passive inclusion and the model of proactive participation. Their difference is essentially whether participation in international division of labor is dominated by multinational firms or by local firms. At the level of representative sectors, some characteristic variables of participation in international division of labor demonstrate significant industry differences. Models of division of labor affect technology progress. According to the empirical analysis result at the micro-level of four sectors, no matter for export or the contribution of learning by doing to corporate technology progress, the model of proactive participation is superior to the model of passive inclusion; under the model of passive inclusion, the technology spillover effect of import is smaller than "learning by doing" effect," under the model of proactive participation, technology spillover effect is over two times the "learning by doing" effect.

关 键 词:intra-product international division of LABOR technology progress China’s manufacturing sector competitive ADVANTAGE 

分 类 号:F114.1[经济管理—国际贸易]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象