中国地学会与导淮(1909—1916年)  

Chinese Geographic Society and Its Study of Dredging the Huai River (1909-1916)

作　　者：谢皆刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学历史系

出　　处：《学术研究》2014年第5期97-106,160,共10页Academic Research

摘　　要：中国地学会建立后,以导淮关系政治与民生,试图合中西治水之长,研究导淮。1912年民国肇造,中国地学会倡议移兵导淮及规画行政区域以便治淮。因时局变动,未获施行。同年北京政府任命张謇督办导淮,导淮筹备工作展开,入海路线成为各方相争的焦点。中国地学会因地域、人事多主由海州入海。其后美国红十字会介入导淮,事关学理、权利。中国地学会与美方争权利失败,中美双方签订了导淮借款草约。欧战爆发引发全球性金融紧缩,借款一延再延,终于无望,导淮事业停顿,鲁皖二省筹款自治,危及下游苏属淮扬徐海。中国地学会一面呼吁停止,一面制定规划谋求解决。Since the dredging of the Huai River related to politics and livelihood closely, Chinese Geographic Society CGS proposed to adopt the advantages of Chinese ancient methods and the western learning to study dredging the Huai River, after its establishment. At the beginning of the Republic of China, CGS proposed to remove troops and plan administrative regions to facilitate the work. Due to the situation at that time, it was not achieved. Then the Beijing Government set up an Administration of the Huai River to prepare the work, and route choice became the focus of controversy. Because of the regional and personnel relationship, the Society asserted the Haizhou plan. The intervention of the American Red Cross(ARC) was related to science, profit and power. The contention between CGS and ARC is not only because of profit and power, but also the plan of draining the Hongze Lake and discharging the Huai River into the Yangtze River that was not conducive to Huaiyang. After the outbreak of war in Europe, the expected loan of the work was stopped because of tight fi-nance, which led to the stop of the plan.

关 键 词：中国地学会 导淮 张謇 美国红十字会 

分 类 号：K258[历史地理—历史学]