检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡传朋[1,2]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学研究生院,重庆401120 [2]常州市钟楼区人民法院,江苏常州213023
出 处:《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2014年第2期74-80,97,共7页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:环境公益诉讼作为对环境公共利益提供救济的诉讼制度,引起了学界和实务界的高度关注,而且在很多省市进行了环境公益诉讼的实践。但实施效果却不很乐观,症结便是我国环境公益诉讼发展中还存在着立法和制度层面的诸多限制因素。借鉴国外先进的立法和实践经验,完善我国当前环境公益诉讼发展中保障制度应当着重建立合理的举证责任分配机制;建议环境公益诉讼的前置程序,防止滥用诉权;建立环境公益诉讼激励制度;建立环境公益诉讼的执行保障制度。As a litigation system providing relief for the the environmental public interest, the environmental public interest litigation attracts unmost attention from both the academia and the practice circle, and has been put into practice in many provinces and cities. However, the effect of implementation is unsatisfactory because there are many legislative and institutional limits in the development of Chinese environmental public interest litigation. Using foreign legislative and practical experience for reference, this essay makes suggestions concerning the improvement of the security system in the environmental public interest litigation in order to promote the environmental protection in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222