检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐丽雯[1]
出 处:《北京行政学院学报》2014年第2期91-96,共6页Journal of Beijing administration institute
摘 要:通过对我国目前劳动争议处理制度现状及问题的分析,提出了完善我国劳动争议处理制度的设想。我国目前实行"一调一裁二审终审"的劳动争议处理制度,这一制度设立的初衷是希望通过调解和准司法性质的劳动仲裁程序解决一部分争议案件,以节约诉讼成本。但实践中,这种模式非但没有达到设计者的预期,反而弊端凸显。尽管2008年《劳动争议调解仲裁法》中的"一裁终局"制度使部分劳动争议案件得以快速解决,但并未从根本上弥补我国劳动争议处理制度的缺陷。通过论证并结合我国国情提出了"调解前置或裁或审各自终局"的劳动争议处理制度的改革设想。With an analysis of the status quo and problems of China’s current labor dispute settlement system, this paper roughs out an idea for improving China’s labor dispute settlement system. China’s current labor dispute settlement system can be characterized by Mediation, Arbitration and Second-instance-being-the-final-instance system, which is taken into account originally for settling a part of labor dispute cases by Mediation and Arbitration (a quasi-judicial procedure) so as to save litigation costs. But in practice, this system not only fails to realize the expectation aim, but also highlights its disadvantages. Although The Arbitration-being-final System in Law of the People’s Republic of China on Mediation and Arbitration of Labor Disputes made parts of labor disputes be resolved quickly, it did not make up for the deficiencies of labor dispute settlement system fundamentally. According to China's situation, this paper discusses and puts forward the reform blueprint of the labor dispute settlement system that includes the pre-litigation mediation procedure should be added as the preceding procedure of litigation and arbitration or trial is final.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28