我国缔约过失责任制度的缺陷与完善  

Defects and Improvement of Contracting Negligence Liability System in China

作　　者：吴浩[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《贵州师范学院学报》2014年第2期23-26,共4页Journal of Guizhou Education University

摘　　要：缔约过失责任理论发端于1861年,最先由著名法学家耶林提出。后德国、法国等国家和地区先后明文规定该制度,我国直到1999年通过新合同法才予以确立。从现有的《合同法》来看,我国立法者吸收、借鉴国外相关的立法经验将缔约过失责任制度确立下来,从而弥补了我国民法领域的一项空白。但是,该制度在我国仍存在诸多不足,在完善立法时首先应当明确界定什么是缔约过失责任,同时还应将先合同义务明文规定,并给出缔约过失责任的赔偿范围。The Contracting Negligence Liability Theory, originating in 1861, was firstly proposed by Jelling, the distinguished scholar in juristic theory, before it was stipulated in countries such as Germany and France. China did not recognize it in its law system until 1999 after the passing of the new contract law, based on which the law makers in China absorbed related experiences in law making from other countries so as to finally settle down on liability for negligence, filling a blank in the domain of civil law in China. Nevertheless, there are still a lot of defects in this sys- tem when run in China, e.g. what liability for negligence should be first explicitly defined before consummating legis- lation. Meanwhile, responsibilities in the law of contract should be clearly stipulated as well as the compensation range for breaking the law of liability for negligence.

关 键 词：缔约过失责任 合同法 先合同义务 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]