检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周江[1]
出 处:《贵州师范学院学报》2014年第2期75-77,共3页Journal of Guizhou Education University
摘 要:高校教师的学术道德问题一直备受关注。对近年发生的三例中德两国论文抄袭案的对比分析有助于探讨和揭示高校教师学术道德问题及其文化根源。虽然存在职能部门无作为和检查机制不完善等原因,但是其根源在于文化精神。与西方传统文化对照,中国传统文化并不重视西方意义上的求真精神,而这种精神与学术研究密切相关。正是由于对求真精神的漠视,才导致在诸多因素的共同作用下,高校教师在学术研究中出现抄袭成风的现象。Academic morality in colleges and universities has always been a great concern. A contrastive analysis of three plagiarizing cases in China and Germany is beneficial for exploring and discovering the root of academic mo- rality in college and universities. Plagiarism may be attributed to many causes such as the negligence of functional de- partments and the impotent inspection mechanism etc. , the root, however, lies in cultural spirit. Compared with western traditional civilization, China traditional culture does not pay attention to western spirit of pursuing truth, which is closely associated with academic research. It is the ignorance of the spirit of pursuing truth that results into the plagiarism among teachers in colleges and universities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117