检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》2014年第2期81-83,共3页Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
摘 要:目的探讨黄斑裂孔不同大小、形态与预后的关系。方法回顾性分析30例特发性黄斑裂孔的临床资料、OCT影像学表现及术后视力。结果视力未提高组裂孔基底径、最小径高于视力提高组(P<0.05),两组裂孔高度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Spearman相关性分析显示,术后视力改善与基底径(r=-0.636)、最小径(r=-0.469)呈负相关(P<0.05)。结论特发性黄斑裂孔术前行OCT检查可通过裂孔基底径和最小径判断预后情况,其中基底径是更好的判断指标。Objective To explore the prognostic factors of idiopathic macular hole based on form of the macular hole. Method The clinical data of 30 patients with idiopathic macular hole were retrospectively analyzed. Results The base diameter and minimum liner diameter of patients with improved visual acuity were smaller than those of patients without improved visual acuity, and there was a negative correlation between those two indicators and prognosis. The difference between height of macular holes had no statistical significance. Conclusion Base diameter and minimum liner diameter are good indexes for prognosis of idiopathic macular hole.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15