检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王博青 刘攀[1] 赵化荣[1] 胡尔西旦·尼牙孜[1] 张宋安[1] 包永星[1]
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤中心,乌鲁木齐830054
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2014年第3期244-247,共4页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基 金:乌鲁木齐市科学技术基金资助项目(H111313001);乌鲁木齐感染与肿瘤重点实验室开放课题(WIT-2013-04)
摘 要:目的 探讨舌体鳞癌患者不同治疗模式的治疗效果.方法 回顾分析2003-2011年间在本院首治的经病理确诊且随访资料完整的舌体鳞癌患者132例临床资料.Kaplan-Meier法计算单纯手术(S)、单纯放疗(R)、手术+放疗(S+R)、化疗+手术(C+S)、化疗+放疗(C+R)、手术+放疗+化疗(S+R+C)各组OS,组间差异采用Logrank法检验.Cox回归模型多因素预后分析确立有影响的治疗模式.结果 3年随访率为100%.3年样本数为94例.全组患者3年OS为72.7%.单因素分析显示70例Ⅰ+Ⅱ期患者中S、R、S+R、C+S、S+R+C的分别为86%、67%、97%、100%、82% (P =0.018),62例Ⅲ+Ⅳ期患者中S、R、S+R、C+S、C+R、S+R+C的分别为38%、14%、92%、40%、14%、67%(P=0.000).多因素分析显示S+R、S+R+C是影响预后的因素(P=0.000、0.005).结论 Ⅰ~Ⅱ期行手术或手术为主综合治疗疗效较好,Ⅲ~Ⅳ期行以手术为主综合治疗预后较好,其中S+R、S+R+C是较好的治疗模式,对中晚期病例行R、C+R预后差.Objective To analyze the therapeutic effects of different treatment modalities in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the complete clinical and follow-up data of 132 patients with pathologically confirmed tongue squamous cell carcinoma,who were initially treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from 2003 to 2011.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the overall survival (OS) rates for patients who received surgery alone (S),radiotherapy alone (R),surgery plus radiotherapy (S + R),chemotherapy plus surgery (C + S),chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (C + R),and surgery,radiotherapy,and chemotherapy (S + R + C).The OS was compared between these groups by log-rank test.Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model to establish independent treatment modalities as prognostic factors.Results The follow-up rate was 100%.The 3-year sample size was 94.The 3-year OS rate for all patients was 72.7%.The univariate analysis showed that among 70 stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ patients,the S,R,S + R,C + S,and S + R + C groups had 3-year OS rates of 86%,67%,97%,100%,and 82%,respectively (P =0.018) ;among 62 stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ patients,the S,R,S + R,C + S,C + R,and S + R + C groups had 3-year OS rates of 38%,14%,92%,40%,14%,and 67%,respectively (P =0.000).The multivariate analysis showed that S + R and S + R + C were independent prognostic factors (P =0.000 and 0.005).onclusions Surgery alone or combination therapy including surgery has a good therapeutic effect for stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ tongue squamous cell carcinoma,while S + R and S + R + C are better treatment modalities for stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ disease;however,advanced patients have a poor prognosis after being treated with R and C + R modalities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31