机构地区:[1] 北京大学人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,100044 [2] 北京大学人民医院临床流行病室,100044
出 处:《中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》2014年第5期356-361,共6页Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
基 金:首都特色临床医学应用发展项目(z121107001012047);北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金(RDC2012-03)
摘 要:目的:探讨喉癌与咽喉反流的关系。方法对31例喉癌与76例对照组(其中36例反流症状和反流体征量表均阴性,40例反流症状指数和/或反流体征评分量表阳性)的一般情况及pH监测参数进行统计学分析。结果喉癌组患者吸烟率80.6%(25/31),与阴性对照组36.1%(13/36)差异有统计学意义( P<0.0167),与阳性对照组50.0%(20/40)差异无统计学意义( P>0.0167)。喉癌组饮酒率71.0%(22/31),与阴性组36.1%(13/36)差异有统计学意义( P<0.0167),与阳性组65.0%(26/40)差异无统计学意义(P>0.0167)。咽喉反流阳性率,喉癌组、阴性对照和阳性对照组分别为74.2%(23/31)、16.7%(6/36)和52.5%(21/40),食管反流阳性率分别为71.0%(22/31)、52.8%(19/36)和75.0%(30/40)。三组间的咽部阳性率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中喉癌组与阴性对照组差异有统计学意义( P <0.0167),喉癌组与阳性对照组差异无统计学意义( P >0.0167)。三组间食管阳性率差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。 pH监测参数发现,喉癌组与阴性对照组的咽喉反流次数、直立位咽喉反流次数、咽喉反流总时间、上探头pH<4时间百分比、长反流次数、咽部DeMeester评分差异均有统计学意义( P值均<0.0167),其中喉癌组与阳性对照组的上述指标差异均无统计学意义( P值均>0.0167)。结论喉癌患者中咽喉反流阳性率很高,但是咽喉反流阳性喉癌患者中吸烟和/或饮酒的比率也很高,咽喉反流是否为喉癌发病的危险因素,有待继续研究。Objective The objective of this study is to investigate the association between laryngeal carcinoma and laryngopharyngeal reflux .Methods This was a case-control study with 31 laryngeal cancer patients who had undergone 24-hour ambulatory double pH monitoring and 76 in the control group which were divided into negative group ( 36 patients ) and positive group ( 40 patients ) by the score of RSI ( reflux symptom index) and RFI ( reflux findings index ) scale.The results of reflux and parameters of 24-hour ambulatory double pH monitoring among the three groups were statistically analysed .Results The smoking rate of 80.6%(25/31) in laryngeal carcinoma group was significantly higher than that of (36.1%, P<0.0167) in the negative group while it did not vary in laryngeal carcinoma group and the positive group (65.0%, P>0.0167).The drinking rate of 71.0% (22/31) in laryngeal carcinoma group was higher than that of (36.1%, P<0.0167) in the negative group whereas there was no significant difference between laryngeal carcinoma group and positive group (50.0%, P>0.0167).The positive rate of laryngopharyngeal reflux in laryngeal carcinoma group , the positive group, the negative group were 74.2%(23/31), 16.7%(6/36) and 52.5%(21/40) respectively, which was significantly different (P<0.05).The positive rate of gastroesophageal reflux in the three groups above were 71.0% (22/31), 52.8% (19/36) and 75.0%(30/40), which had no significant difference ( P>0.05).The positive rate of laryngopharyngeal reflux differed in laryngeal carcinoma group and the negative group (P<0.0167) while did not differ in laryngeal carcinoma group and the positive group ( P >0.0167).In the results of 24-hour ambulatory double pH monitoring , there was significant difference in the total and upright reflux number , the total reflux time , the percent times for the pH falling below 4, total reflux number which lasted more than 5 minutes
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...