论授权性法律法规的规范适用——以我国《刑法》关于立功、自首、悔罪的法律条文为例  

On the Standard Use of Authorized Laws and Regulations ——Take Articles of the Criminal Law on Making Contributions,Committing One's Crimes and Showing Repentance as Examples

作　　者：杜雄柏[1] 黄成[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《邵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2014年第3期54-59,共6页Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目"学校人员违法犯罪问题研究"(07C020)

摘　　要：授权性法律法规具有灵活性,法官采纳或不采纳都是合法的。然而在现代法治视域下,法官随意采纳或不采纳是违背法律规范性要求的。《刑法》中对有立功、自首、悔罪情节而可以从轻或者减轻处罚的授权性规范在内容设计上不规范。同时,在我国现有法律体系下没有对授权性法律法规可适用范围进行有效地界定,对法官合理适用没有科学的指导。同一案件采纳和不采纳这类授权性规范会产生性质差异很大的判决,进而容易导致合法的司法不公。The execution of authorized laws and regulations is flexible and it is rightful whether theJudge adopts them or not. However, in terms of modern rule of law, it violates regulatory requirementswhether the Judge adopts them or not at will. Some articles are not standardized in the Criminal Law, aslesser or mitigated punishment would be given if one makes contributions, commits his or her crimes orshows his or her repentance. Meanwhile, in our existing legal system, the applicable range of laws andregulations on authorization is not properly defined, so there is no scientific guideline for the Judge todecide when and where to adopt authorization. Adopting or not adopting such authorization will make abig difference on the judgment of the same case, thus causes lawful unfair adjudication.

关 键 词：授权性 规范 公平 恰当性 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]