青少年自我控制双系统量表中文版的效度和信度  

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Dual-Mode of Self-Control Scale for adolescents

作　　者：谢东杰[1,2] 王利刚[1] 陶婷[1] 樊春雷[1] 高文斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室,北京100101 [2]中国科学院大学,北京100049

出　　处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2014年第5期386-391,共6页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基　　金：中国科学院心理研究所科研启动经费(社交网站互动经验对青少年自我概念的影响作用;Y2CQ051005);国家科技支撑计划项目(儿童青少年心理行为异常特征的早期识别;预警与干预技术;2012BAI36B01)

摘　　要：目的:修订自我控制双系统量表(DMSC-S)中文版,并检验其效度和信度。方法:选取5个省的4462名青少年进行问卷调查,回收有效问卷3978份。通过项目分析筛选项目,将总样本随机分半后分别进行探索性因素分析(n=1990)和验证性因素分析(n=1988)。两周后,从总样本中选取716名青少年进行重测。结果:经过3次探索性因素分析,得到的DMSC-S中文版有21个条目,分为控制系统(包含问题解决、未来时间观2个因子)和冲动系统(包含冲动性、易分心、低延迟满足3个因子),累计方差贡献率为50.55%。双系统模型的验证性因素分析所得指标均符合心理测量学的要求(RMSEA=0.06、NFI=0.92、NNFI=0.92、CFI=0.93)。总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.82,控制系统、冲动系统分别为0.74、0.80,5个因子分别为0.71、0.61、0.80、0.60、0.48;总量表的重测信度(r)为0.77,控制系统、冲动系统分别为0.64、0.75,5个因子分别为0.58、0.62、0.76、0.64、0.63。结论:青少年自我控制双系统量表中文版具有较好的结构效度和信度,适合用于评估我国青少年的自我控制能力水平。Objective：To revise the Chinese version of the Dual-Mode of Self-Control Scale （DMSC-S） for adolescents,and test its validity and reliability. Methods： Totally 4,462 adolescents from 5 provinces were recruited and asked to complete the Chinese version of DMSC-S. Item analysis was conducted to identify valid items and revise the scale. Exploratory factor analysis （EFA） and confirmatory factor analysis （CFA） were used to confirm the structure of the scale. Two weeks later,716 of the participants were retested. Results： The revised scale consisted of21 items,including ＂good control＂ （problem solving,future time perspective） and ＂poor control＂ （impulsivity,distractibility,and poor delay of gratification）. The factors explained 50. 55% of the total variance. Besides,the CFA indicators of the dual-modes of self-control were in requirements of psychometric （RMSEA = 0. 06,NFI = 0. 92,NNFI = 0. 92,CFI = 0. 93）. The Cronbach α coefficient of the scale was 0. 82. The coefficients of ＂good control＂ and ＂poor control＂ were 0. 74 and 0. 80. Those of the 5 factors were 0. 71,0. 61,0. 80,0. 60 and 0. 48. The test-retest reliability was 0. 77. The test-retest reliabilities were 0. 64 for ＂ good control＂ and 0. 75 for ＂ poor control＂.Those of the 5 factors were 0. 58,0. 62,0. 76,0. 64 and 0. 63. Conclusion： It suggests that the Chinese version of DMSC-S could be used as an effective and reliable tool for assessing self-control of Chinese adolescents.

关 键 词：自我控制 双系统模型 效度 信度 心理测量学 

分 类 号：B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学] B841.7[哲学宗教—心理学]