目的论视域中民事检察监督权与诉权的关系  

On the Relationship Between the Power of Civil Procurator Supervision and the Litigation Right from Functionalism and Teleology Perspective

作　　者：杜睿哲[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学法学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《西北师大学报（社会科学版）》2014年第3期123-129,共7页Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：甘肃省社会科学规划一般项目"差别司法正义及其运行机制研究";西北师范大学教师骨干项目"民事检察权优化配置研究"(SKQNGG11020)

摘　　要：检察机关在民事诉讼中有诉讼职能与监督职能,我国民事诉讼法没有赋予检察机关提起民事诉讼的权力,只享有法律监督这一职能。从监督职能行使的目的、动机来看,民事检察监督有救济性监督和督察性监督两种类型。救济性监督以救济当事人的权利为主,以监督为辅,因而在处理与当事人诉权关系时,应坚持尊重和保障诉权以及救济的补充性和适度性原则;督察性监督以监督审判权为主,以救济当事人的权利为辅,在处理与当事人诉权关系时,应坚持监督的优先性和职权强制性原则。Procurator carries on the function of litigation and supervision in civil proceedings . Under Civil Procedure Law of PRC , procurator is not conferred by the power of civil litigation , but only has the supervision function . According to the purpose and motive of supervisory function , civil procurator supervision is divided into two types ：remedial supervision and overseeing supervision . The former emphasizes more on the legal remedies according to the parties than on the supervision , and w hile dealing with the relationship of the parties＇right of litigation should pay much attention to and safeguard the right to litigation ,following the principle of due and compensatory remedy . The latter emphasizes more on the supervision over the jurisdiction than on the legal remedies according to the parties , and should adhere to both the principles of priority of supervision and functional coercion .

关 键 词：民事检察监督 诉权 救济性监督 督察性监督 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]