检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2014年第3期75-80,共6页Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目"当代文学理论观念的嬗变与创新研究"(12AZW004);江西省社会科学规划重点项目"唯物史观视野与当代文论问题研究"(11wx01)
摘 要:在文艺学界关于文学本质问题的论争中,学者们对本质主义与反本质主义的理解可谓大相径庭。本文对其中一些理论命题与基本观点加以了梳理、辨析,并对这场论争所涉及的重要问题进行了探讨:如反本质主义理论思潮兴起的原因是什么?反本质主义究竟是什么与为什么?应当如何认识这场论争的意义?总的来看,这场论争是与传统文艺学在"后文学"时代遇到的困境和挑战有关,与文艺学界在这种挑战面前努力寻求突破的理论焦虑有关,与当代文学理论知识生产转型重建的价值选择有关。In the debate about literary essence among the academic circles, there are great gap among scholars' understanding of essentialism and anti-essentialism, and it is necessary to comb and discriminate some basic theories and concepts. More importantly, we should have a rational reflection on some important issues of this debate. In general, this debate is not accidental, but related with the difficulties and challenges which the traditional literary theory encountered in the "post literature era", with the anxiety to seek a breakthrough under this challenges for the academic circles, and with the choice of value on the transformation and reconstruction of knowledge production in contemporary literary theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.168.137