检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卫洪波[1] 魏波[1] 郑宗珩[1] 黄勇[1] 黄江龙[1] 方佳峰[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第三医院胃肠外科,广州510630
出 处:《中华胃肠外科杂志》2014年第5期465-468,共4页Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基 金:广东省自然科学基金重点项目(10251008901000011);广州市科技计划项目(2011J4100105)
摘 要:目的:探讨腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)的手术和肿瘤学安全性,并与开放胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)进行疗效对比。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2013年6月中山大学附属第三医院胃肠外科收治并行胰十二指肠切除术患者的临床资料,根据所行术式分为LPD组和OPD组,对比分析手术时间、术中出血量、清扫淋巴结数目、术后第1天腹腔引流量、术后排气时间、恢复流质饮食时间、术后发热天数、术后住院天数、术后并发症发生率、1年生存率和复发率等指标。结果两组患者性别、年龄、ASA分级、手术时间、清扫淋巴结数目、病理分期、术后发热天数、术后引流管拔除时间、术后并发症发生情况以及术后1年生存率和肿瘤复发情况等指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。而LPD组相比OPD组,术中出血量[(168.2±87.4) ml比(353.5±140.1) ml,P=0.000]及术后第1天腹腔引流量[(157.7±69.7) ml比(289.1±197.0) ml,P=0.039]减少,术后排气时间[(4.1±0.9) d比(6.6±3.4) d,P=0.024]、恢复流质饮食时间[(5.8±1.3) d比(8.2±3.5) d,P=0.040]、下床活动时间[(3.6±1.4) d比(6.2±1.5) d,P=0.000]和术后住院天数[(17.0±2.2) d比(25.7±13.8) d, P=0.047)明显缩短。结论与传统开放手术相比,LPD能够保证肿瘤根治性切除和手术安全的同时,在减少术中出血和促进术后恢复过程方面具有明显优势。Objective To investigate the surgical and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), and compare its efficacy with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Methods Clinical data of 40 patients with malignant tumor undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2012 and January 2013 in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into LPD and OPD group according to operative procedure. Operative time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, drainage on first postoperative day (POD1), first flatus day, time to liquid diet, postoperative period of fever, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and 1-year cumulative survival rate and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in operative time, harvested lymph nodes, TNM stages, postoperative period of fever, time to drain removal, postoperative complications, 1-year cumulative survival rate and recurrence rate (all P>0.05). As compared to OPD group, LPD group showed less blood loss [(168.2 ±87.4) ml vs. (353.5 ±140.1) ml, P〈0.001], drainage on POD1 [(157.7±69.7) ml vs. (289.1±197.0) ml, P=0.039], earlier flatus [(4.1±0.9) d vs. (6.6±3.4) d, P=0.024], shorter time to liquid diet [(5.8 ±1.3) d vs. (8.2 ±3.5) d, P=0.040], earlier ambulation [(3.6±1.4) d vs.(6.2±1.5) d, P〈0.001], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [(17.0±2.2) d vs. (25.7±13.8) d, P=0.047]. Conclusion LPD confers similar surgical and oncological outcomes and is superior to OPD in terms of decreased blood loss and rapid postoperative recovery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157