语言习得的3种哲学解释及其分析  

Three Philosophical Explanations for Language Acquisition and Their Inadequacies

作　　者：范连义[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海立信会计学院,上海201620

出　　处：《外语学刊》2014年第3期13-18,共6页Foreign Language Research

基　　金：教育部人文社科研究项目"维特根斯坦的哲学语言学习观"(10YJA740021)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文对3种哲学语言学习观进行哲学意义上的探讨。这3种理论都在维特根斯坦后期哲学思想启发下形成,都与意义怀疑主义相关。它们分别是幸运说、社区控制说和第二天性说。通过分析这3种理论,对照维特根斯坦的生活形式观,我们认为它们都存在不足,因此尝试提出自己的观点:儿童母语习得过程是一个个体与社会互动的开放过程,是人在其生活形式上的意义不断展开。In this paper, we explore three different ways of picturing language learning in philosophy, all of them inspired by Wittgen- stein and all of them are related to skepticism of meaning. The three theories are as follows ： luck theory, community control theo- ry and second nature theory. Through the analysis of the above theories and our interpretation of Wittgenstein＇s later concept of ＂form of life＂, we think that none of them could satisfactorily explain language learning, and thus we attempt to propose our idea： Language acquisition is a co-activities between individual and the community, which is an open process and the unfoldings of an individual as a human on a certain of form of life.

关 键 词：维特根斯坦 语言学习 生活形式 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]