检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]延边大学附属医院胸外科,吉林延边133000
出 处:《重庆医学》2014年第14期1727-1728,1731,共3页Chongqing medicine
摘 要:目的研究外科手术治疗食管癌中电视胸腹腔镜下和传统开胸手术两种方法的疗效。方法选取于该院胸外科治疗的中老年食管癌,根据手术治疗方法不同分为腔镜组和开胸组,记录病理诊断结果、手术一般情况及术后住院时间和并发症。结果腔镜组在术中出血量较少,术后住院时间短,并发症发生更少,与开胸组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论电视胸腹腔镜手术治疗食管癌安全性高,疗效肯定,值得广泛研究和推广。Objective To detect the contrast of vido‐assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and conventional thoracotomy lobectomy for esophageal carcinoma .Methods 30 cases advanced esophageal carcinoma were selected in our hospital and divided into VATS group and thoracotomy group ,recorded pathological diagnosis ,operation and postoperative hospital stay and complications .Results VATS group had less bleeding ,shorter postoperative hospital stay ,less complications ,there was significant differences compared with thoracotomy group .Conclusion VATS in the treatment of advanced esophageal carcinoma have high safety ,definite curative effect ,and is worthy of extensive research and extension.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117