民间借贷案件证明过程之分析  

Analysing the Proving Process in Cases of Private Loaning

作　　者：吴旭莉[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《现代法学》2014年第3期143-153,共11页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：近年来民间借贷案件激增,妥善解决纠纷方可维护社会稳定。证明借贷关系的基础证据是当事人陈述及书证,其中书证主要包括借据及转账凭证。书证既有优越性,也有局限性。民间借贷案件当事人的举证责任在不同的阶段有"举证完成"与"后果承担"两层不同的意义。经验法则、测谎技术皆可运用于证明过程。法官应全面、客观地审核各种证据,运用逻辑推理和经验法则对证据进行综合评判。民间借贷案件应确立以法律真实为基础的高度盖然性证明标准。The cases of private loaning surge in recent years, resolving the disputes appropriately is the important measure to stabilize society. The parties＇ statement and documentary evidence are the fundamental evidences. The IOUs and transfer vouchers are documentary evidences. Documentary evidence has both advanta- ges and disadvantages. The burden of proof of the parties has different significance, in the first stage, it means completion of the burden; in the second stage, it means taking the consequences. Judge can apply the experience rules and polygraph before rendering judgement. Judge should review the evidence comprehensively and objectively, combining with logic reasoning and experience, and make decision on the basis of evidence. The proof standard in cases of private loaning should be the high degree of probability based on legal truth.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 证据规则 民间借贷案件 证明 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]