机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院,重庆400016 [2]四川文理学院教务处,达州635000 [3]重庆医科大学附属第二医院妇产科,重庆400016 [4]重庆医科大学附属第二医院心内科,重庆400016
出 处:《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》2014年第5期719-724,730,共7页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(09YJC840057);重庆市沙坪坝区科普项目(201203)~~
摘 要:目的评价同伴教育对农村留守中学生性健康的干预效果,探索适合西部农村留守中学生的健康教育模式。方法多阶段整群随机抽取四川达州3个农村中学,每个中学抽取6个初二班级,再随机分为同伴教育组、传统教育组和对照组。分析干预前后的问卷调查数据以检验短期效果(知识),对同伴教育组和传统教育组干预后6个月再进行随访调查以检验中长期效果(态度和行为)。结果干预后,同伴教育组的性健康知识总知晓率从49.4%提高到75.3%,知识平均分从(6.77±3.14)分提高到(8.61±2.88)分,差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。传统教育组的总知晓率从51.0%提高到67.5%,平均分从(6.89±2.91)分提高到(7.41±3.11)分,差异也有统计学意义(P=0.024)。对照组干预前后平均分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。同伴教育组干预后即时调查的知识平均分为(8.61±2.88)分,显著高于传统教育组的(7.41±3.11)分(P=0.000),平均分差异为1.19分(95%CI为0.58-1.81)。6个月后随访调查显示,与干预前比较,同伴教育组和传统教育组均正性态度率提高、负面行为率降低(P〈0.05);且同伴教育组效果优于传统教育组(P〈0.05)。结论针对农村留守中学生开展性健康干预取得了明显效果,同伴教育方法更适合留守农村中学生的性健康教育,健康态度和行为的长期变化需要进一步研究。Objective To evaluate the intervention effect of peer-led education on the sexual health of rural left- behind middle school students and explore the health education mode suitable for rural left-behind students in West China. Methods Three rural schools in Dazhou, Sichuan province were sampled by the multi-stage cluster random sampling method. Six second grade classes of each school were selected and randomly divided into the peer-led education group, traditional education group, and control group. Data of questionnaire surveys before and after the intervention were analyzed to evaluate the short term effect (knowledge). Follow-up surveys of the peer-led education group and traditional education group were conducted after being intervened for six months to evaluate the medium and long-term effect (attitude and behavior). Results The awareness rate of sexual health knowledge of the peer-led education group increased from 49.4% to 75.3% and the average sore increased from 6.77 ±3.14 to 8.61 ±2.88 after being intervened. The differences were statistically significant(P=0. 001). The awareness rate of sexual health knowledge of the traditional education group increased from 51.0% to 67.5% and the average sore increased from 6.89 ±2.91 to 7.41 ±3.11 after being intervened. The differences were statistically significant (P = 0. 024). The difference of the average sores of the control group before and after intervention was not statistically significant (P 〉0.05). The average sore of the peer-led education group immediately after intervention was 8.61 ±2.88, which was significantly higher than 7.41 ±3.11 of the traditional education group (P=0. 000). The difference of the average sore was 1.19 (95% CI was 0.58 - 1.81). Follow-up surveys after six months showed that rates of positive attitude of the peer-led education group and traditional education group increased and rates of negative behavior decreased compared to those before intervention (P 〈0.05). The results of the peer-le
分 类 号:R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...