检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邸岩[1] 高炳霞[1] 齐颖[1] 宋丹萍[1] 苗丽[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院干部医疗科,北京市100038
出 处:《世界华人消化杂志》2014年第12期1709-1712,共4页World Chinese Journal of Digestology
摘 要:目的:探讨泌特治疗功能性消化不良(functional dyspepsia,FD)的临床疗效及其对患者胃排空的影响效果.方法:按照随机数字表法将世纪坛医院门诊收治的102例FD患者均分为实验组和对照组,对照组患者给予枸橼酸莫沙必利片治疗,实验组患者在此基础上给予泌特治疗,比较两组患者临床疗效及胃排空情况.结果:实验组患者治疗显效率和总有效率均明显高于对照组(58.82%vs 39.22%,94.12%vs 70.59%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组2 h和5 h胃全排空率和胃总排空率均明显高于对照组(23.53%vs 11.76%、94.12%vs 52.94%、55.00%vs 30.00%、95.00%vs65.00%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:泌特治疗功能性消化不良疗效显著,能够明显改善患者胃排空情况,是药物治疗功能性消化不良的首选.AIM: To explore the effect of Mite on gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). METHODS: One hundred and two patients with FD were randomly divided into either an experimental group or a control group. The control group was treated with mosapride citrate tablets, while the experimental group was treated with Mite on the basis of mosapride citrate tablets. The clinical effects and index of gastric emptying were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The significant improvement rate and the total response rate were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (58.82% vs 39.22%, 94.12% vs 70.59, P 〈 0.05). The rates of gastric emptying and the total rate of gastric emptying at 2 and 5h in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (23.53% vs 11.76%, 94.12% vs 52.94%, 55.00% vs 30.00%, 95.00% vs 65.00%, P 〈 0.05). CONCLUSION: Treatment with Mite can improve gastric emptying in FD patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.41