机构地区:[1]南方医科大学附属中山市博爱医院消化内科,广东省中山市528403 [2]南方医科大学附属中山市博爱医院放射科,广东省中山市528403 [3]南方医科大学附属中山市博爱医院检验科,广东省中山市528403
出 处:《世界华人消化杂志》2014年第12期1713-1719,共7页World Chinese Journal of Digestology
摘 要:目的:探讨胃pH联合胆红素监测对病理性十二指肠胃反流(duodenogastricreflux,DGR)的诊断价值.方法:本文对20例对照组和90例具有DGR症状的胃炎组分别进行胃镜及组织学检查、总胆汁酸测定、核素显像、胃pH联合胆红素监测诊断DGR,并进行对比性分析.结果:(1)四种方法检查20例对照组DGR(+)检出率,结果显示:胃镜及组织学检查30.0%(6/20),总胆汁酸量测定15.0%(3/20).核素显像10.0%(2/20),胃PH联合胆红素监测0%(0/20),胃PH联合胆红素监测DGR(+1检出率与胃镜及组织学比较,有显著性统计学差异(P〈0.01),与其他检查比较无统计学差异(P〉0.05);(2)四种方法检查90例胃炎组DGR(+)检出率,结果显示:胃镜及组织学检查76.7%(69/90),总胆汁酸测定60%(54/90).核素显像47.8%(43/90),胃pH联合胆红素监测53.3%(48/90),胃pH联合胆红素监测DGRf+)检出率与胃镜及组织学比较,有显著性统计学差异(P〈0.01),与其他检查比较无统计学差异(P〈0.05);(3)3种方法检查胃炎组准确性与核素显像比较,结果显示:胃镜及组织学检查62.2%,有显著统计学差异(P〈0.01),总胆汁酸测定81.1%(P〈0.05),有统计学差异,胃pH联合胆红素监测90.0%,无统计学差异(P〈0.05、(4)根据准确性、敏感性、特异性、假阳性、假阴性几项指标的综合评估,反映DGR诊断准确性程度高低的检查顺序为胃pH联合胆红素监测、核素显像、总胆汁酸测定、胃镜及组织学检查.结论:胃pH联合胆红素监测是诊断DGR最准确的方法,是非常有价值的科研及临床确诊DGR的手段,值得推广应用.AIM: To explore the diagnostic value of combined gastric pH and bilirubin monitoring in pathologic duodenogastric reflux (DGR) METHODS: In this study, we randomly included 90 gastritis patients and 20 controls. For detection of DGR, all subjects underwent gas-troscopy and histological examination, total bile acid test, radionuclide imaging, gastric pH and bilirubin monitoring. A comparative analysis was then performed between the two groups. RESULTS: In the control group, the percenta of DGR (+) patients detected by gastroscopy and histological examination, total bile acid test, radionuclide imaging and combined gastric pH and bilirubin monitoring were 30.0% (6/20), 15.0%(3/20), 10.0% (2/20) and 0% (0/20), respectively. Compared with gastroscopy and histological examination, the detection rate of combined gastric pH and bilirubin monitoring was significantly lower (P 〈 0.01), although no statistical significance was observed between combined gastric pH and bilirubin monitoring and other examinations (P 〉 0.05). In the gastritis group, the percentages of DGR (+) patients detected by gastroscopy and histological examination, total bile acid test, radionuclide imaging and combined gastric pH and bilirubin monitoring were 76.7% (69/90), 60.0% (54/90), 47.8% (43/90) and 53.3% (48/90), respectively. Compared with the gastroscopy and histological examination, the detection rate of combined gastric pH and bilirubin monitoring was significantly lower (P 〈 0.01), although no statistical significance was observed between combined gastric pH and bilirubin monitoring and other examinations (P 〉 0.05). The accuracy rates of gastroscopy and histological examination (62.2%) and total bile acid test (81.1%) were significantly lower than that of radionuclide imaging (P 〈 0.01, P 〈 0.05), but there was no significant difference between combined gastric pH and bilirubin monitoring (90.0%) and radionuclide imaging (P 〉 0.05). Based
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...