非法占有目的司法推定的现实困境及路径探析——以“集资诈骗罪”为例  

Plight and Path of Judicial Presumption of Purpose of Illegal Possession

作　　者：赵静[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《福建警察学院学报》2014年第1期80-85,共6页Journal of Fujian Police College

摘　　要："非法占有目的"作为一种主观的超过要素,认定时通常采用司法推定的方式,但是由于规范本身的混乱、矛盾,我国现有司法推定模式在实践中面临诸多困境。要完善"非法占有目的"的司法推定模式,就应当做到以下几点:第一,合理择取,保证基础事实的客观性、确定性与可靠性;第二,改变以"结果型"为主的推定模式,采用以"行为型"为主的推定模式,注重主客观相统一;第三,加强、完善司法推定程序方面的制度设计,保障司法推定的规范化开展。As a subjective element,the purpose of illegal possession is usually identified by judicial presumption. However,the confusion and contradiction in the judicial interpretations of China lead to the plight in practice. To improve the judicial presumption of purpose of illegal possession,we should take some measures： firstly,choose the basic facts of judicial presumption reasonably; secondly,base the judicial presumption on the actions rather than on the results and make the subjective and objective a unity; finally,improve the institutional design of the judicial presumption procedure and make the presumption function normatively.

关 键 词：非法占有目的 司法推定 现实困境及路径探析 集资诈骗 

分 类 号：DF623[政治法律—刑法学]