我国专利诉讼中技术法官制度面临的挑战  

Challenges of Technical Judges System in Patent Litigation of China

作　　者：易玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学所,北京100009

出　　处：《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第3期81-83,共3页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金项目"专利无效判定的行政与司法博弈研究"(13CFX090);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目"专利诉讼中技术法官制度之构建与挑战研究"(12YBA100);湖南省自然科学基金项目"专利审查机制及其创新性研究"(13JJ4092)

摘　　要：比较法上观察,各国采取不同的制度强化法院专业技术的处理能力,以此来解决专利有效性之司法判定问题。美国配置了专家证人,但因司法体制的特殊性实现起来成本较大;日本、韩国的技术审查官制度有一定的科学性,但治标不治本。德国的技术法官制度对技术法官的地位、专业技能的培养等做出了科学的规定,解决了专利无效判定之司法的彻底性问题。我国应在结合国情的基础上引入技术法官,强化现有法官的专业技能,设置法律法官与技术法官类别,作为专利制度改革的具体路径。By observation and comparison, many countries adopt different systems to strengthen the professional technology, in order to solve the judicial patent validity of decision problem. America provides expert witness, but because of the special judicial system, implementation cost is larger. The technical examination system of Japan and Korea is of certain science, but a temporary solution. The technical judges system of German makes a scientific definition of the role of the judge and the training of professional skills, solves thoroughly the judgment of patent invalid justice. China＇ s future in the mechanism of selection of judges can be introduced to strengthen existing technical judge, judge professional skills, set the law judge and judge category, completely solve the problem of judicial judgment.

关 键 词：专利诉讼 技术法官制度 司法判定 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]