检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]武汉市江岸区人民法院办公室,湖北武汉430019
出 处:《河北法学》2001年第1期46-48,共3页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:我国现行民事撤诉制度,因法律规定过于疏简,缺乏可操作性,在审判实践中暴露出了很多问题。民事撤诉制度的建立与完善应以原告自由处分原则为基础,着眼于原告撤诉权与人民法院审查权的平衡,实现对原告撤诉权与被告合法权益平等、公正的法律保护。从撤诉权的行使及其时间,不准撤诉的范围和撤诉裁定的方式等方面对民事撤诉制度中存在的若干问题提出了一些想法。The system of civil withdrawing charges has been exposed of many problems because legal stipulations are negligent、simple and lack of operational character. The establishment and perfection of this system should be based on principle of plaintiff's free disposition and arm at balancing the right of plaintiff's revocation with the power of court's judicial review, so as to carry out protecting equally to the right of plaintiff's withdrawing charges and the legal rights of the defendant. The article puts forwards some opinions about withdrawing charges' application、time、score of ungranted revocations and form of rulings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222