论《合同法》预期违约与不安抗辩权制度存在的缺陷  

On the Defects of Anticipatory Breach of Contract and Unpeaceful Right of Pleadings System in Law of Contract

作　　者：范晓峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北广播电视大学,河北石家庄050061

出　　处：《河北法学》2001年第1期147-151,共5页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：预期违约和不安抗辩权分别是英美法和大陆法中的传统制度，《合同法》经过借鉴吸收，在１０８条和６８、６９条规定了我们自己的预期违约和不安抗辩权．但由于认识上的局限，这种借鉴却导致预期违约制度传统的优势被削弱以及与不安抗辩权在适用上的冲突。Anticipatory breach of contract and unpeaceful right of pleadings are the traditional systems belonging respectively to Anglo - American law and continental law. By borowing from it and obsorbing, the Law of Contract stipulates ourselves' antipatory breach of contract and unpeaceful right of pleadings in No. 108、68 and 69 articles of law. But because of the limitations in understanding, the action of using other's experience leads to the fact that the traditional superiority of anticipatory breech of contract system has been weakened and leads to the conflicts in application with the unpeaceful right of pleadings.

关 键 词：预期违约 不安抗辩权 合同法 英美法系 大陆法系 比较分析 中国 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学] D923.6[政治法律—法学]