药学研究生创造力培养评价体系探讨  

Evaluation system for the cultivation of pharmacy postgraduate students＆#39; creativity

作　　者：余瑜[1] 杨竹[1] 冯涛[1] 李勤耕[1] 杨俊卿 范琦[1] 胡湘南[1] 黄华[1] 刘新[1] 李伟 

机构地区：[1]重庆医科大学药学院药物化学教研室,400016

出　　处：《中华医学教育探索杂志》2014年第4期325-330,共6页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research

基　　金：重庆市研究生教育教学改革研究项目（yjg110336）

摘　　要：目的 针对目前药学研究生培养存在创造力不足的主要问题,探讨药学研究生创造力培养评价体系构建.方法 利用问卷调查和访谈相结合的方法,通过对重庆医科大学药学院药物化学、药剂学、药物分析学和药理学等专业的硕士和博士研究生导师33人、硕士和博士研究生104人进行问卷调查.采用Excel 2003建立数据库,用SPSS 18.0进行统计学分析;对培养模式、兴趣与选题能力、独立科研能力等方面调查数据行描述性分析或t检验.结果 67.31％（70/104）的研究生认为采取团队导师制培养研究生比单一导师制好（t=4.409,P=0.011）.师生认为：研究生考核评价体系及其评价指标具有客观、公正和可操作性;应注重研究生的创新能力培养;应注重培养研究生独立的科研能力.研究生培养除自身努力外,导师起着主导作用;例如,在选题能力培养方面（t=6.220,P=0.002）,特别是在培养研究生独立科研能力方面导师有着不可或缺的作用（t=5.115,P=0.004）.结论 建立药学研究生创造力培养评价体系很有必要.该评价体系及其指标具有客观性、公正性、科学性、可操作性,对提升药学研究生创造力培养水平与质量有一定的积极影响和帮助.Objective To study the evaluation system for phamacy postgraduate creativity training aiming at the lack of the creativity of pharmacy postgraduates.Methods Questionnaire and interview were combined to study the evaluation system for phamacy postgraduate creativity training.Questionnaire survey was conducted among 33 postgraduate tutors and 104 postgraduates from the majors of medicinal chemismy,phamaceutics,pharmaceutical analysis and phamacology in college of phamacy of Chongqing Medical University.The database was established by using Excel 2003 and SPSS 18.0 software was used to do statistical analysis.Descriptive analysis and t-test were adopted for data analysis of training mode,interests and subject ability,and independent scientific research ability.P〈0.05 indicates the statistical significant differences.Results 67.31%（70/104） postgraduates thought that the tutorial team was better than the single tutor（t=4.409,P=0.011）.Both the teachers and the students agree that the postgraduate evaluation system and evaluation indexes were objective,justice and feasible.Attention should be paid to the cultivation of the innovative ability and independent research ability of postgraduates.In addition to the postgraduates＇ own efforts,the tutor at the same time played a leading role,for example,in the aspects of topic choosing and capacity-building （t=6.220,P=0.002）,especially in the aspect of training postgraduates＇ independent scientific research ability（t=5.115,P=0.004）.Conclusions It is necessary to establish the evaluation system for pharmacy postgraduate creativity training.The evaluation system and its indexes are objective,impartial,scientific,feasible,and also has a active influence on promoting the creativity and quality of phamacy postgraduates.

关 键 词：药学研究生 创造力 创新意识 创新能力 评价体系 

分 类 号：R91[医药卫生—药学]