检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋雷[1]
出 处:《泰山医学院学报》2014年第4期279-280,共2页Journal of Taishan Medical College
摘 要:目的评价安非他酮治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性。方法将60例符合CCMD-3诊断标准的抑郁症患者随机分为安非他酮组和丙米嗪组各30例,分别治疗6周。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定疗效,采用副反应量表(TESS)评定药物的不良反应。结果两组治疗后HAMD评分均较治疗前有显著降低(P<0.05),治疗1、2、4、6周末两组间HAMD评分均无显著差异(P>0.05)。治疗第4、6周末,安非他酮组TESS评分低于丙米嗪组,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论安非他酮治疗抑郁症有效,且不良反应发生率低于丙米嗪。Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bupropion in the treatment of depression. Methods 60 patients who met CCMD-3 were assigned randomly into the Bupropion group or the Imipramine group. The Bupropion group was treated with Burpropion,while the Imipramine group was treated with Imipramine for 6 weeks. Effects and side effects were evalued seperately with HAMD and TESS before and after the treatment. Results:The scores of HAMD decreased significant-ly in both group after the completion of treatment(P﹤0. 05),while in each same period,the scores shew no significant difference between the two group(P﹥0. 05). The scores of TESS in Bupropion group became significantly lower than in the Imipramine at the end of 4 and 6 week(P﹤0. 05). Conclusion:Bupropion can improve the therapeutic effect significantly and less side effects than Imipramine.
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.3.240