我国行政诉讼协调制度的司法实践及其反思  

The Judicial Practice and Reconsideration of the Coordination of Administrative Litigations in China

作　　者：徐涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200240

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第2期61-68,共8页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2011年上海市教委科研创新项目"和谐社会背景下的我国行政复议制度研究"(编号:11ZS164)

摘　　要：为着规范行政诉讼中的协调,人民法院发布了一系列规范性文件,公布典型案例。通过这些司法文献的发布,我国行政诉讼中协调制度的初步轮廓已经形成。但是,为了加强协调制度的正当性和有效性,法院还需要补强协调制度的法理依据,细化"合法"和"自愿"的内容,优先适用普通审理程序,厘清协调的适用范围,并明确和解协议的性质和效力。To regulate the coordination in administrative litigation, the supreme people’s court hasissued regulations and publicized typical cases. By publishing judicial literature, the coordination systemof China’s administrative litigations has a tentative development. But to make this system more rationaland effective, the court should enhance its legal basis, clarify the requirements of “lawful” and “will-ing”, make the common process preferential, define the scope of the coordination system, definitude thenature and effect of the agreement and so on.

关 键 词：协调 行政诉讼 司法文献 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]