检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]惠州市第三人民医院中医科,广东惠州516002 [2]惠州市第三人民医院老年科,广东惠州516002
出 处:《海南医学》2014年第10期1427-1428,共2页Hainan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨老年轻度认知功能障碍(Mild cognitive impairment,MCI)发生的相关因素。方法 50例老年MCI患者纳入MCI组,50例与MCI年龄、性别相匹配的未合并MCI的老年人纳入对照组,比较两组研究对象的临床资料并进行统计学分析。结果 MCI组患者学历在高中以上者比例为20%、职业为脑力劳动者比例为26%、居住方式为独居者比例为28%、有脑卒中病史者占34%、合并高血压者占58%、糖尿病者占40%,SDS评分为(44.2±7.3)分、TG为(2.04±0.41)mmol/L、TC为(6.18±0.81)mmol/L,对照组分别为36%、46%、12%、14%、38%、22%、(38.5±6.4)分、(1.53±0.32)mmol/L、(5.22±0.67)mmol/L,上述指标在两组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论老年MCI的发生与独居、脑卒中病史、合并高血压、糖尿病高脂血症及抑郁症有关,而文化程度高及脑力劳动是其保护性因素。Objective To investigate the related factors of mild cognitive impairment in elderly person. Methods Selected 50 elderly patients with MCI to be the MCI group,and 50 elderly people without MCI in age and sex-matched with MCI to be the control group.At the end of study,the clinical data were compared and analyzed for statistically. Results In the MCI group, the proportion of education≥senior middle school was 20%, the proportion of mental occupation was 26%, and living alone mode was 28%, with a history of stroke was 34%, 58%with hypertension, diabetes accounted for 40%, the SDS score was (44.2±7.3), the level of TG was (2.04±0.41) mmol/L, TC was (6.18±0.81) mmol/L, and that in the con-trol group was 36%, 46%, 12%, 14%, 38%, 22%, (38.5 ± 6.4), (1.53 ± 0.32) mmol/L, (5.22±0.67) mmol/L, these indicators revealed statistically significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion The related factors of MCI in the elderly include living alone, history of stroke, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and depression, whereas high levels of education and mental are the protective factors.
分 类 号:R749.16[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38