民意与司法博弈中的程序正义之价值——以“吴英案”为例  

The Value of Procedural Justice of the Game of Public Opinion and Judicature——Take“Wu ying Case”For Example

作　　者：孙洪坤[1] 张毅[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江农林大学法政学院,浙江杭州311300

出　　处：《时代法学》2014年第3期17-22,共6页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：作者主持的2012年浙江省哲学社会科学规划重点项目(12YD23Z)成果之一

摘　　要："吴英案"在羁押、律师会见、开庭准备、涉案财产处置等环节存在诸多程序违法问题,使该案深陷舆论漩涡。这一场民意与司法的激烈博弈,将我国刑事司法过程中的程序问题暴露无遗。表征法治文明程度的程序正义,不仅能从维护法的独立性、促进实体公正性、保障法的安定性等方面提升民众司法的品质;而且能从促进实体结果被接受程度、吸收败诉方的不满情绪和提升对司法信任度等方面促进民意趋于理性。There are many procedure violation issues in ＂Wu Ying case＂, including the custody, meeting with the lawyer, trial preparation, disposal of the involved property, etc. All these problems lead the case to a deep vortex of public opinion. Besides, this legal case manifested the intense debate over public opinion and judicature, exposed the procedural problems in criminal justice thoroughly. Characterization of procedural justice, rule of law, and the degree of civilization , these can not only maintain the independence of law , but also promote physical fairness, stability and other aspects of security legislation, which will enhance the quality of public justice . Promoting entity results of degree of acceptance , absorbing the losing party＇s dissatisfaction mood and enhance trust in the judiciary can tend to a more rational public opinion.

关 键 词：吴英案 理性民意 品质司法 程序正义 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]