《资本论》在何种意义上是明晰的?——驳阿隆的“模棱两可和取之不尽”  

In What Sense Is Das Kapital Clear?

作　　者：沈斐[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]中国浦东干部学院科研部 [2]复旦大学经济学院

出　　处：《哲学研究》2014年第6期9-15,128,共7页Philosophical Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"资本内在否定性的当代意蕴"(编号11CZX014);中国博士后科学基金项目"资本的内在否定性:基于方法论视角的政治经济学批判"(编号2012M520785;2013T60399);复旦大学"985三期"项目"‘中国崛起'的政治经济学诠释与政治经济学理论创新研究"(编号2011RWSKYB001)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：“模棱两可的和取之不尽的”是法国社会学家、经济学家阿隆在1968年联合国教科文组织纪念马克思诞辰150周年大会上所作的主题发言。他在发言中说：“如果我们用马克思所引发的或激起的争论的范围来衡量他的伟大，那么两个世纪以来，有谁能与他相比？”阿隆指出，两个世纪以来，马克思文本之“模棱两可的丰富性”为每一个学科、每一方论战者都提供了“取之不尽的主题”：Most of distortions and slanders to Marx stem from the misunderstanding of the methodology of Das Kapital.It's also true in Raymond Aron.Although he is closest to Marx by criticizing Sartre and Althusser,he still can't understand the uniqueness of the method of Das Kapital;materialist dialectics.Marx applies the materialist dialectics in his research of Das Kapital and forms a unique method of internal negativity of capital,that is,an idea of capital's self-denial and aufheben.Das Kapital is not ' ambiguous' as said by Raymond Aron,but a distinct clarity expressed by the internal negativity of capital.Because the clarity in Dos Kapital is not static and single dimensional,but fluctuant and tridimensional,is not an identification of subjective and objective in common sense,and not a definitude of meaning in analytical philosophy,but an unity of the dialectical theory system and its reaction of economic life with self-contradiction.

关 键 词：《资本论》 联合国教科文组织 马克思文本 意义 1968年 社会学家 经济学家 丰富性 

分 类 号：K825.1[历史地理—历史学]