检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]海南大学经济与管理学院,海南海口570228
出 处:《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2014年第3期107-113,120,共8页Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71062009);教育部新世纪人才支持计划项目(NCET-10-0123)
摘 要:以2011年成功实施并购的主并上市公司为样本,基于产权性质视角探讨内部控制、高管控制权与并购绩效的内在关系。研究结果表明:高管控制权膨胀导致上市公司并购绩效降低,且相对于非国有控股公司,国有控股公司更为强烈;完善的内部控制体系有助于并购绩效的提升,但在国有控股公司,现阶段内部控制尚不能约束高管控制权导致的绩效损害;与之相反,在非国有控股公司,内部控制在一定程度上能够限制高管控制权,提高并购绩效。With the Chinese listed companies that succeeded in implementing mergers and acquisition in 2011as the samples,the paper explores the internal relationship among internal control,executive control rights and M A performance under perspective of the nature of property rights. The results show that the over-expansion of executive control rights reduces the M A performance of listed companies,and the state-owned holding companies behave more strongly with respect to the non-state-owned ones. While the sound internal control system helps to improve the M A performance,the internal control still fails to constrain the performance damage caused by executive control rights at present. In the non-state-owned holding companies,conversely,the internal control can constrain executive control rights and improve M A Performance to a certain extent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229