检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢永和[1,2]
机构地区:[1]广东肇庆学院文学院 [2]扬州大学文学院
出 处:《北华大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第1期79-84,共6页Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)
基 金:中国博士后科学基金项目"胡怀琛与转型期新旧文学调和问题研究"(2013M531409);江苏省博士后科研资助计划项目"胡怀琛与转型期新旧文学调和问题研究"(1301155C)的阶段性研究成果之一
摘 要:胡适的《尝试集》出版仅月余,诗人学者胡怀琛撰文对之发难,并替胡适改诗,由此引发一场笔墨官司。嗣后胡怀琛搜集相关书信文章汇成《尝试集批评与讨论》一书出版。细读《尝试集批评与讨论》史料可见:胡怀琛对胡适的态度平和低调,而胡适对胡怀琛的态度则轻蔑傲慢;胡怀琛评改《尝试集》的目的是打磨新诗艺术。胡怀琛的诗学观念亦新且旧,学人对胡怀琛的评价不高,但胡怀琛对《尝试集》的评改,从批评实践层面为五四新诗建设提供了诸多诗学启示。just more than a month after the publication of Chang Shi ji of Hu Shi,the poet and scholar Hu Hua-ichen wrote articles criticizing and changing the verse,later Hu Huaichen collected the relevant articles into his book Criticism and Discussion on Chang Shi ji. From the historical data in Criticism and Discussion on Chang Shi ji,the readers may see Hu Huaiche’s attitude to Hu shi quiet and low-key;while Hu Shi’s attitude toward Hu Huaichen contemptuous and arrogance. Due to his poetics idea is new and also old,the other scholars didn’t think highly of Hu huaichen. But criticizing and changing Chang Shi ji by Hu Huaichen provided the poetic in-spiration for the construction of the May fourth new poetry from the aspect of critical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222