检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋高初[1]
出 处:《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第3期19-24,共6页Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究项目"我国犯罪被害人物质损失弥补问题研究"(10YJA820090)
摘 要:由于我国刑事附带民事诉讼调解前置问题的立法不统一,常导致纠纷当事人在侦查阶段、审查起诉阶段提出的附带民事诉讼调解意愿在司法实践中难以实现。文章指出,基于附带民事诉讼的本质属性,在侦查阶段、审查起诉阶段开展附带民事诉讼调解活动具有理论可行性;通过构建附带民事诉讼调解工作激励机制、明确调解案件范围、灵活把握调解成立条件、加强对调解结果关联被追诉者刑罚待遇的理由说明等,以增强附带民事诉讼调解前置的现实可行性。Currently , there is no unified legislation about the civil lawsuit pretrial mediation attached to criminal lawsuit in our country , which will cause the parties ’ appeal to civil lawsuit pretrial mediation attached to criminal lawsuit being unsupported in the course of criminal investigation and prosecution .The paper points out that based on the nature of attached civil lawsuit , it is theoretically feasible to carry out civil lawsuit pretrial mediation during the process of criminal investigation and prosecution .In order to strengthen the feasibility of civil lawsuit pretrial mediation attached to criminal lawsuit in reality , we shall establish the incentive mechanism of the pretrial mediation , limit the pretrial mediation case scope , grasp the mediation condition flexibly and strengthen the explanation of the mediation results associated with the defendant ’ s penalty .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33