检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡海华[1] 沈国鑫[1] 唐杰[1] 瞿恒娟 叶永强[1] 苏佩华[1] 陆旭艳 黄金兰[1] 沈钰[1]
出 处:《中国实用神经疾病杂志》2014年第10期29-30,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Nervous Diseases
摘 要:目的探讨磁化传递(MT)技术与时间飞跃法(3D-TOF)在磁共振血管成像(MRA)中的应用价值比较。方法对82例患者同时行磁化传递(MT)技术法和常规3D-TOF法的MRA扫描,并对两者原始图像进行三维重组、对比分析。结果磁化传递(MT)技术法MRA的血管背景被完全抑制,分支小血管显示清晰,而常规3D-TOF法MRA的血管背景抑制不全,末梢分支小血管显示不清或未显示。结论磁化传递(MT)技术法较常规3D-TOF法的MRA更能获得高清晰血管图像。Objective To compare the application value between MT technology and 3D-TOF in MRA. Methods Eighty-two patients accepted MRA scanning by both MT technique and conventional 3D-TOF method ,the original images of the both kinds were done with three-dimensional reconstruction and analyzed.Results MT MRA vascular background was completely inhibited ,branches of small vessels were clearly displayed ,and the vascular background suppression of conventional 3D-TOF MRA was not complete ,peripheral branches of small vessels were not clear or not shown.Conclusion The MT method is superior to the conventional 3D-TOF method MRA to obtain high clear vascular images.
分 类 号:R741.04[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3