检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龙凤钊[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》2014年第3期95-102,共8页Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:解决争议是诉讼制度的根本,转型时期的社会矛盾突出背景下,行政争议的持续扩大,突显了行政违法问题的严重性。然而,我国行政诉讼制度的低能、缺位现状,使人不得不思考问题出在哪里,解决机制又当如何?在《行政诉讼法》修改之时,应从受案范围的扩大与诉讼类型制度的构建来提升行政诉讼的制度功能,构建动态、完整的司法程序,发挥司法审查的潜在功能,以此才能整体性地增强并整合行政救济制度的功能。Dispute resolution is a key to litigation. In the social transformation period contradiction background, administrative disputes are continuing to expand, which highlights the seriousness of the problem of administrative violations. However, China's administrative litigation system is inefficient and out of position, so people have to think about where the problem is, and how dose the settlement mechanism play its role? At the time of the modification of the Administrative Procedure Law, we should expand the scope of accepting cases and litigation type system to enhance the reconstruction of the system of administrative litigation, build dynamic and complete judicial process, and help the judicial review play the potential functions, so as to overall enhance and integrate administrative relief system functions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15