黑格尔主奴理论与马克思《巴黎手稿》生态思想的内部关系分析  

Relations between Hegel's Theory of Lordship and Bondage and Marx's Ecology Thought in Paris Manuscripts

作　　者：周江平[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学文学院

出　　处：《东南学术》2014年第4期43-50,246,共8页Southeast Academic Research

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目"马克思生态思想中的黑格尔和解论因素"(项目编号:92326198)

摘　　要：就劳动的积极意义而言,由于古典经济学家理念的影响,黑格尔的主奴理论与马克思的《巴黎手稿》在"人——自然——人"的关系维度上具有相同的叙事逻辑和结构。但就劳动的全面意义而言,黑格尔主奴理论以劳动的精神形态为基础,只承认人与自然的和谐关系,却把人与人的关系对立于"恶的循环"体系中;马克思的《巴黎手稿》以劳动的物质形态为基础,认为资本主义生产中劳动异化使人与自然,人与人形成对立关系,并在对立关系内部酝酿着消解"恶的循环"的积极力量——无产阶级,而无产阶级的奋斗目标共产主义是实现人与人、人与自然完全和解的社会形态。In the positive sense of labor,Hegel's theory of Lordship and Bondage and Marx's Paris Manuscripts have the same narrative logic and structure within the dimension of framework of man- nature- man because of the influence of classical economists. In the comprehensive sense of labor,Hegel just acknowledges the reconciliation between man and nature while putting the rivalry between men into an ' evil circle' based on his mental state of labor. However,based on a physical state of labor,Marx thinks the alienation of labor in capitalist production leads to the antagonistic relations between man and nature as well as between men,within which a positive strength i. e. the proletariat,is growing up to dispel the ' evil circle',who regards communism as its objective of struggle to realize the entire reconciliation between man and nature as well as between men.

关 键 词：黑格尔 主奴理论 马克思 《巴黎手稿》 生态思想 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]