检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张正炎[1]
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学研究生教育学院,上海200063
出 处:《安徽行政学院学报》2014年第3期91-95,共5页Journal of Anhui Academy of Governance
摘 要:行政诉讼受案范围决定着受到行政主体侵害的行政相对人的诉权范围。因此,受案范围规定是否完善影响着行政相对人的合法权益。《行政诉讼法》所确定的以具体行政行为标准的受案范围难以操作,无法充分发挥保障行政相对人合法权益的作用。而我国司法解释所确立的以权利义务为标准的受案范围适应了行政审判实践,同时对保障相对人合法权益起到积极作用。因此,转变行政诉讼受案范围的标准,不仅可以保障行政相对人合法权益,而且能够促进行政诉讼制度的发展与完善。The scope of administrative litigation determines the scope of the right to appeal when the administrative relative person was damaged by administrative subject. Therefore, whether the provision of case range is perfect or not has an effect on the interests of the administrative relative person. It is diffieuh to operate and unable to protect the interests of the administrative relative person which the specific administrative act as a standard of the ease range is required by the "Administrative Procedure Law ". However, the rights and obligations as standard of the ease range established by judicial interpretation adapt to the administrative trial practice. It plays a positive role in protecting the interests of the administrative relative person at the same time. Therefore, the changing in the standard of case range not only can protect the interests of the administrative relative person, but also can promote the development of the administrative litigation system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117