我国农村义务教育经费配置效率研究——基于DEA和Malmquist指数的实证分析  

On Allocative Efficiency of Rural Compulsory Education Expense:An Empirical Analysis Based on DEA and Malmquist Index Models

作　　者：李玲[1] 闫德明[1,2] 黄宸[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学教育学部/教育政策研究中心,重庆400715 [2]河南教育学院数学与统计学院,郑州450046

出　　处：《教育与经济》2014年第3期3-7,15,共6页Education & Economy

基　　金：2013年度教育部哲学社会科学发展报告项目"教育体制综合改革发展报告"(项目编号:13JBGP040);2013年国家社科基金年度重点项目"城乡一体化教育体制的社会支持系统研究"(项目编号:13ASH005);2010年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"构建城乡一体化的教育体制机制研究"(项目编号:10JZD0041)

摘　　要：2000年以来,国家加大了对农村和中、西部义务教育的经费投入。为了评估政策的落实效果,给教育决策提供科学参考,本研究采用全国30个省(自治区、直辖市)2003-2010年农村义务教育经费投入与产出面板数据,基于DEA和Malmquist指数法对我国东、中、西部和全国农村义务教育经费配置效率进行了动态评价。研究结果发现,我国各省农村义务教育经费配置效率整体状况较高,东部农村义务教育经费配置效率低于中、西部地区。我国各省农村的全要素生产率呈下降趋势,中、西部农村全要素生产率下降幅度比东部大。Since 2000, Chinese government has increased compulsory education funding in rural areas and central and western part of China. To assess the effect of policy implementation and provide scientific reference to the Chinese compulsory education funding policy, this paper dynamically evaluates the allocative efficiency of compulsory education expense in east, middle and west part of China and nationwide rural areas based on DEA and Malmquist index models and panel data （2003-2010） of rural compulsory education financial input and output of 30 provinces （autonomous regions and municipalities）. The results shows that the allocative efficiency of rural compulsory education expense in each province is overall in good condition, and allocation efficiency of education funding in the eastern part is lower than that in the central and western parts. TFP of rural areas in each province presents in downward trend, and falling range of TFP in central and western rural areas is larger than that in the eastern rural areas.

关 键 词：数据包络分析 MALMQUIST指数 义务教育经费 配置效率 

分 类 号：F08[经济管理—政治经济学] G40-054[文化科学—教育学原理]