检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学经济学院,长春130117 [2]日本一桥大学商学院研究科
出 处:《教育与经济》2014年第3期8-15,共8页Education & Economy
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年项目"教育公平视角下的公共教育支出优化研究"(项目编号:11YJC790855);教育部人文社会科学青年项目"均衡外汇管理框架下我国外汇储备的风险;收益研究"(项目编号:11YJC790181)
摘 要:财政分权与公共品供给的有效性一直是国内外学者广泛关注的热点问题。本文利用中国1997-2011年的省际面板数据,通过选择合适的空间面板模型实证研究中国式财政分权对教育支出的直接影响,以及相邻地区财政分权度对当地教育支出的空间溢出效应。本文主要结论是:中国的财政分权形成了财政激励,使得地方政府过度追求经济增长,而忽视了对教育的投资;并且,财政分权对教育支出具有负向的空间溢出效应,即相邻地区财政分权程度提高会对当地的教育投入产生不利影响;政府规模以及政绩考核下的政府竞争对教育支出也具有负向的空间溢出效应。文章的研究结果为中国公共教育投入以及财政分权体制的进一步完善提供了一定的政策启示。Fiscal decentralization and efficiency of public goods provision are always the hot topics that attract extensive attention of both domestic and foreign scholars. With choosing appropriate spatial panel model, this paper aims to explore direct effects of sinotype fiscal decentralization on education expenditure, and spatial spillover effects of fiscal decentralization in neighboring region on local education expenditure based on provincial panel data from 1997 to 2011. It comes to the conclusions as follows: fiscal decentralization in China provides local governments with fiscal incentives to pursue economic growth excessively and neglect to invest in education. And fiscal decentralization has negative spatial spillover effects on education expenditure, which means increasing the degree of decentralization in neighboring region has a bad impact on education investment in local region. Government scale and government competition under cadre's performance evaluation also have negative spillover effects on education expenditure. The conclusions provide some policy implications for further improvement of public education investment and fiscal decentralization in China.
分 类 号:F08[经济管理—政治经济学] G40-054[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229