琉球问题所涉“剩余主权”论的历史与法律考察  

A Historical and Legal Investigation of "Residential Sovereignty" Concerning the Ryukyu Issues

作　　者：罗欢欣[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院国际法研究所

出　　处：《日本学刊》2014年第4期63-81,共19页Japanese Studies

摘　　要："剩余主权"论是美国和日本在1971年签订《琉球与大东群岛协定》的理论基础,美国据此将"琉球与大东群岛"区域交由日本"管理",日本称之为"冲绳归还"。"剩余主权"论从杜勒斯最早提出到《琉球与大东群岛协定》中的演变,其内容不统一,理论也不完整,还存在与联合国托管制度不兼容等诸多法律障碍。鉴于"剩余主权"论本身的非法性与无效性,它不能成为日本拥有琉球主权的依据。The concept of ＂residential sovereignty＂ was the theoretical basis of the agreement concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands signed by Japan and the United States in 1971. According to the agreement, the United States ＂relinquished in favor of Japan the administrative control over the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands＂, which is usually referred to as ＂Okinawa reversion＂ by Japanese government. The concept and theory of ＂ residential sovereignty＂ was originally put forward by then American secretary of states Dulles, and it had developed and contributed to the final U. S -Japan agreement concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands; however, the process indicates that the theory has its defects, with its content logically self - contradictory and incompatible with the principles of trusteeship under the United Nations Charter. The null and illegal theory of ＂Residential sovereignty＂ should not be taken as the evidence of Japan＇ s territorial claim to Ryukyus.

关 键 词：琉球 剩余主权 旧金山和约 琉球与大东群岛协定 钓鱼岛争端 

分 类 号：D993.5[政治法律—国际法学] K107[政治法律—法学]