对地方法院司法创新之初步反思——以“能动司法”为叙事背景  

Preliminary Reflection on Judicial Innovation of Local Courts

作　　者：张榕[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院

出　　处：《法学评论》2014年第4期172-177,共6页Law Review

基　　金：作者主持的2010年教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目<中国法院能动司法机制研究>(项目批准号:10YJA820131)的阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：在近年来的司法改革和能动司法实践中,各地法院的司法创新层出不穷,但这些司法创新基本上属于政治性和法外工作方法上的能动司法。就其结果而言,无论在改善法院的政治地位方面,或在提升司法公信力方面,均收效甚微。事实上,一个不能彰显专业性和职业自律品格的司法权不但不能得到政治权威的尊重,亦无法获取普通民众的肯认。因此,应当深刻反思法院一直以来对司法困局的破解路径,并探寻当今中国司法价值的本质依托之所在。Through the whole process of judicial reformation and the practice of Chinese style judicial activism, many local people＇ s courts continued to bring out various judicail inovocation models. However, they mainly focued on the politicial and instrument side. According to the consequences, not only in improving the political status of the people＇ s court, but also in promoting the judicial authority, all displayed poorly. In fact, the composition of the judicial authority depends more on professional knowledge and self-regulation than what the most people＇s court did under the idea of Chinese style judicial actism. A layman like judicial style couldn＇ t taken fully respect by the political institiution, also the approval of the people in that country. So , its time to rethinking the key which not that effect but strongly occupied our mind to resolve the predicament of chinese judicail system. It is a question left. What should we do？ And what is the essence of the judical value in contemporary of China？

关 键 词：地方法院 能动司法 司法创新 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]