论认知转喻在反讽理解推理过程中的作用——《雷雨》的认知文体分析  

Metonymic Inferencing in the Process of Understanding Irony

作　　者：司建国[1] 

机构地区：[1]深圳职业技术学院应用外国语学院,广东深圳518055

出　　处：《深圳职业技术学院学报》2014年第4期38-43,共6页Journal of Shenzhen Polytechnic

基　　金：广东省社科"十一五"规划项目<认知隐喻;转喻维度的曹禺戏剧研究>(09K-05)

摘　　要：本文认为,转喻不是一个认知域或认知框架中两个实体的相邻关系,而是反映两个以上认知域或框架之间的关系;转喻不只表示单纯的替代或指称,而是源始项对目的项的激活或凸显。反讽话语的理解推理过程,涉及连续、复杂的框架转换,而各种概念转喻在框架转换中起着重要作用。其中,转喻ACONCEPT FOR ITS OPPOSITE出现的频率很高,而且出现在反讽框架被凸显的关键位置,这与反讽表示对立的本质属性高度吻合。The present study is about the metonymic inferencing in understanding irony. We assume that metonymy is not about the contiguity relations of the two entities within the same cognitive domain or frame, but rather the connection of multiple domains or frames. Metonymy is more concerned with sources＇ activating or highlighting targets, rather than standing for or referential relations of them. The inferencing process in the understanding irony is related to a series of complicated frame shifting, which basically relies on conceptual metonymies, among them, Aconcept for its opposite is most understanding, this tallies with the fundamental feature of ironies： opposition relationship.

关 键 词：转喻 反讽 框架转换 推理 

分 类 号：H05[语言文字—语言学]