检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田亮[1] 卢勉飞[1] 林干[1] 陈霖熙 蔡芷荷[1] 吴清平[2]
机构地区:[1]广东环凯微生物科技有限公司,广东广州510663 [2]广东省微生物研究所,广东广州510663
出 处:《食品研究与开发》2014年第10期86-88,共3页Food Research and Development
基 金:广东省财政厅项目(2011S-P1881)
摘 要:对新型HK-MID-Listeria生化鉴定系统的鉴定性能进行评估。以传统的生化鉴定为基准方法,对分离自食品的101株李斯特氏菌野生株用HK-MID-Listeria和API-Listeria两种鉴定方法进行鉴定比对。结果表明:HK-MID-Listeria和API-Listeria两种鉴定系统分别与传统鉴定方法符合率分别为100%和93.1%;HK-MID-Listeria与API-Listeria两者的符合率为93.1%。鉴定数据经过统计学处理,HK-MID-Listeria与API-Listeria对李斯特氏菌属的鉴定结果并无显著性差异(P>0.05)。HK-MID-Listeria鉴定李斯特氏菌属具有快速,简便的特点,不需要特殊的仪器,成本低廉,更适合应用在食品卫生方面的检测。Identification performance of the new HK-MID-Listeria biochemical identification system was assessed. Based on traditional biochemical identification method, the HK-MID-Listeria identification system has been compared with that of the API-Listeria for the identification of 101 wild strains isolated from food. Results showed:the coincidence rate of the HK-MID-Listeria and the API-Listeria respectively compared with the traditional biochemical identification methods were 100%and 93.1%;The coincidence rate of the HK-MID-Listeria compared with API-Listeria the was 93.1 %. Base on the statistical analysis, there is no significant difference among two identification system (P〉0.05) in this study. The new HK-MID-Listeria biochemical identification system has a good prospect in estimating to be attributable to consumption of foods contaminated by Listeria. Because HK-MID-Listeria is a rapid, simple and economical method to identify Listeria.
分 类 号:TS207.4[轻工技术与工程—食品科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

