两种范畴观对立的消解——以词类划分为例  

An Investigation into Two Contradicting Category Theories and Their Possible Reconciliation Taking Word Classification as Illustration

作　　者：刘向东[1] 陈立杰[2] 

机构地区：[1]天津科技大学外国语学院,天津300222 [2]浙江农林大学国际学院,浙江杭州311300

出　　处：《重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第3期133-138,共6页Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：在后学背景下,存在两种几乎完全对立的范畴理论——经典理论与原型理论,这两种理论在范畴的界定、范畴的清晰性与模糊性、范畴成员地位等方面存在重大分歧。探讨两种理论之间分歧的根源以及对立消解的可能性。研究证明,两种范畴观处于人类认识系统的不同阶段、不同层次上,各自有其作用范围,不构成对立关系。两种范畴观的对立在一个更大的体系中可以消解,各自对人类认识做出应有的贡献。Under the post - modernism context, there are two contradicting theories of category and categorization ： classical theory and prototype theory. The two theories disagree with each other in every essential aspect： definition, fuzziness, membership, etc. This research aims to investigate the origin of the disagreements, and to explore the possibility of their reconciliation. It has been proved that the two theories focus on different levels and stages of human categorization. Therefore, a contradiction between them is groundless. In fact, they can peacefully coexist within a larger system, playing their respective roles in human categorization.

关 键 词：经典理论 原型理论 矛盾 消解 词类划分 

分 类 号：H0-06[语言文字—语言学]