浅议近亲属的“免证特权”  

A Probe on "Privilege of Witness" of Near Relatives

作　　者：戴鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东警官学院,广东广州510232

出　　处：《政法学刊》2014年第2期24-30,共7页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：新刑诉法规定强制证人出庭,但对被告人的父母、配偶、子女做出例外规定,一定程度上确立了近亲属的"免证特权",但该规定的不完善以及传闻证据规则的缺位,纵容了司法机关采纳未出庭证人的书面证言,不仅与"免证特权"的初衷相违,更是剥夺被告人的对质权。只有真正完善近亲属的"免证特权",并确立传闻证据法则,才能从体系上实现发现案件真实、保护特定关系以及保障被告人对质权的平衡。The new Criminal Law prescribes forcefully attendance of witness but the accused person＇s parents, spouse and children have the privilege of non - attendance. However, the imperfection of such a prescription and the deficiency of hearsay rules make judicial organs have the fight to adopt the written deposition of non- witness, which is against the original intention of Privilege of Witness＇ and deprives the accused person＇s right of confrontation. ＂ Privilege of Witness＂ needs to be improved and hearsay rules need to be established in order to keep a balance between reality of cases and the accused person＇s right of confrontation.

关 键 词：免证特权 传闻证据法则 发现真实 对质权 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]