检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海第二医科大学附属第九人民医院口腔医学院口腔内科,上海200011
出 处:《上海口腔医学》2001年第1期54-55,共2页Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
摘 要:目的 比较三金羟磷灰石根管封闭剂与传统根管封闭剂的封闭能力。方法 采用美兰渗漏染色法测定 3种根管封闭剂的根尖渗漏染色长度。结果 三金羟磷灰石糊剂、碘仿糊剂、氧化锌丁香油糊剂的根尖渗漏平均染色长度分别为 2 .40mm、4.37mm、5 .80mm。三金羟磷灰石糊剂与碘仿糊剂及氧化锌丁香油糊剂的美兰渗入长度有显著差异 (P <0 .0 1)。碘仿糊剂与氧化锌丁香油糊剂的美兰渗入长度无显著差异。结论 三金羟磷灰石根管封闭剂与传统根管封闭剂比较 ,具有很好的根尖封闭效果。Objective To compare the apical sealing ability of Sankin hydroxyapatite root canal sealer with traditional root canal sealers. Methods Determination of the length of apical dye leakage by methylene leakage test. Results The length of apical dye leakge of Sankin hydroxyapatite root canal sealer was 2.40mm, that of iodoform paste and zinc oxide eugenol paste was 4.37mm and 5.80mm,respectively. There was no significant difference between iodoform paste and zinc oxide eugenol paste( P >0.05);whereas there was significant difference between Sankin hydroxyapatite root canal sealer and iodoform paste or zinc oxide eugenol paste( P <0.01). Conclusion Sankin hydroxyapatite root canal sealer has better apical sealing ability than traditional root canal sealers. [
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15